The one movie that stuck with me more than any other, and the one I will return to again and again, is To The Wonder - Terrence Malick's poetic vision of love. It's pure cinema, full of beautiful imagery, with a timeless symbolic story. In a year where Ben Affleck dominated the entertainment press, this was the one movie with the audacity to cast him but not let him speak on camera.
The story begins in Europe, as two lovers discover the rapture of throwing themselves into a hurricane of commitment, passion, and bliss. Ben Affleck is the man, and Olga Kurylenko is the woman. Her voiceover begins the movie, as she speaks in French of memory and amour. Malick's camera glides over air, land and sea; across shadows, ice, and mud. When Affleck brings his love back home to Oklahoma, we see painterly images of an America more exquisite than anything we ever see at the movies. Small town parades, fast food drive-ins, big American backyards, grocery stores. Malick finds the spiritual in all of it.
This is not a typical Hollywood movie. It's challenging. It's not easily defined. It's odd, but never incoherent. As the imagery shifts from the divine to the terrestrial, new conflicts arise. Javier Bardem portrays a conflicted Catholic priest, whose melancholy is palpable. His parishioners pray so he will receive the gift of joy.
Rachel McAdams plays Affleck's former love, who returns to disrupt his new Eden. But this movie is not really about the plot, because life is not just a story with a beginning, middle and end. It's a collection of moods, feelings, images. Lives, perspectives, changing seasons, shifting landscapes. Timeless struggles.
To The Wonder has been seen by very few people and it's easy to dismiss as pretentious and baffling. What a shame. It's filled with more beautiful imagery and soul than any movie this year. This is big-screen cinema -- not glorified TV or a 90 minute commercial. To The Wonder is everything great movies aspire to.
Take a chance and check it out. Give it time, and think about it. By the end, you'll be lost in thought over your own life. And not many movies can offer that.
Tuesday, December 31, 2013
Top 10 Movies of 2013
10. Pacific Rim - For a big budget, effects driven, blow everything up kind of movie, this was the most fun and original.
9. Frances Ha - A showcase for Greta Gerwig, in the best performance by an actress this year.
8. Captain Phillips - A tough, real-world thriller, with Tom Hanks in his best role in over a decade.
7. Nebraska - A true American original. CLICK HERE for the full review.
6. Dallas Buyers Club - Jared Leto and Matthew McConaughey shine in a touching, true story. CLICK HERE for the full review.
5. All Is Lost - J. C. Chandor directs Robert Redford in the best performance by an actor this year. CLICK HERE for the full review.
4. Mud - One of the best original stories of 2013, and a master class in screenwriting. Yet another great performance by Matthew McConaughey.
3. Inside Llewyn Davis - Still captivated by this touching, funny gem from the Coen Brothers. Oscar Isaac is headed for stardom. CLICK HERE for the full review.
2. Gravity - The most stunning visuals that technology has to offer combine with a timeless human story. Catch it on the big screen if you still can.
1. To The Wonder - A Terrence Malick work of art, something to be discovered, appreciated, and re-interpreted for many years to come. CLICK HERE for the full review.
9. Frances Ha - A showcase for Greta Gerwig, in the best performance by an actress this year.
8. Captain Phillips - A tough, real-world thriller, with Tom Hanks in his best role in over a decade.
7. Nebraska - A true American original. CLICK HERE for the full review.
6. Dallas Buyers Club - Jared Leto and Matthew McConaughey shine in a touching, true story. CLICK HERE for the full review.
5. All Is Lost - J. C. Chandor directs Robert Redford in the best performance by an actor this year. CLICK HERE for the full review.
4. Mud - One of the best original stories of 2013, and a master class in screenwriting. Yet another great performance by Matthew McConaughey.
3. Inside Llewyn Davis - Still captivated by this touching, funny gem from the Coen Brothers. Oscar Isaac is headed for stardom. CLICK HERE for the full review.
2. Gravity - The most stunning visuals that technology has to offer combine with a timeless human story. Catch it on the big screen if you still can.
1. To The Wonder - A Terrence Malick work of art, something to be discovered, appreciated, and re-interpreted for many years to come. CLICK HERE for the full review.
![]() |
To The Wonder |
Sunday, December 22, 2013
iPod, iPhone, iMac, iAlone - "Her"
The alienation of the modern man is something we see everyday. People talking in cars with no passengers, or eyes focused on a tiny screen yet oblivious to the flesh and blood around them. I once asked someone if it was going to rain and the response was: "Check your phone - there's an app for that." In "Her," the new movie written and directed by Spike Jonze, technology evolves to the next level: computers have highly intelligent operating systems with personalities that take the place of human love and relationships.
"Her" stars Joaquin Phoenix as Theodore Twombly: a lonely writer wandering through his newly divorced life. He walks around the near-future Los Angeles, lost in his thoughts and memories, immersed in video games and anonymous chat rooms. When his new computer speaks with Scarlett Johansson's voice, he's smitten. It's more than the voice, however. "Samantha" is a caring, thoughtful being who listens and understands Theo. She/It becomes his constant companion, going on dates, vacations, and sharing every intimate moment together. To Theo, Samantha is perfect.
"Her" explores the meaning of love and relationships as deeply as any movie this year. It's the most modern love story I've seen in a while, not because of the technology, but because of the confusion and frustrations that all couples encounter. As Theo falls for Samantha, he's also forced to confront his ex-wife (Rooney Mara), ventures on an awkward, unsuccessful blind date (Olivia Wilde), and comforts a friend (Amy Adams) as her own relationship collapses. We see all sides of the dating/marriage spectrum - and so does Samantha. She processes everything and decides for herself what to make of this foolish thing we call love.
Once again, Joaquin Phoenix proves himself to be one of the top actors working today. If you have any doubts about his past, check out this recent profile in the LA WEEKLY. He single-handedly carries the movie, often speaking alone on-screen, or simply reacting. It's an awesome performance and one of the year's best. Scarlett Johansson also gives a brilliant performance as Samantha, growing from simple commands to all the stages of love, and beyond. Her work is touching and very tangible, despite her physical absence.
"Her" is also a triumph of production and costume design. Set in an undisclosed year, the sets were designed by K. K. Barrett who creates a familiar, yet alien world. The movie combines elements of Downtown Los Angeles with Shanghai to create an overcrowded megalopolis where characters live vertically adrift in glass and steel. I kept marveling at the juxtaposition of wood and paper with the familiar in this new world.
One problem with the movie is that I imagined all the dangers that could possibly go wrong when falling in love with your operating system - yet none ever happen onscreen. "Her" needs a few extra jolts, especially when the Samantha gimmick wears thin. Although I suppose it's not that type of movie as the conflicts here are more subtle. Theo carries on, shifting slightly in his worldview, making the movie more cerebral. This is not a traditional big-screen romance between two beautiful movie stars - this is solitaire. As a result, it drags at times when the plot should be progressing. The nature of who we love, why and how are provocative musings that make this movie more art-house than multiplex.
Spike Jonze has said that this movie is not autobiographical; that it's about all relationships. I'm sure that was his intention, but yet as the sole writer I'm certain he must have drawn upon his own experience. "Her" makes for a great companion piece to "Lost in Translation," which is also a semi-autobiographical film about relationships. That was written and directed by Sofia Coppola, whose marriage to Spike Jonze was ending during its production. Taken together, these movies are two sides of the same story - the whole catastrophe.
"Her" stars Joaquin Phoenix as Theodore Twombly: a lonely writer wandering through his newly divorced life. He walks around the near-future Los Angeles, lost in his thoughts and memories, immersed in video games and anonymous chat rooms. When his new computer speaks with Scarlett Johansson's voice, he's smitten. It's more than the voice, however. "Samantha" is a caring, thoughtful being who listens and understands Theo. She/It becomes his constant companion, going on dates, vacations, and sharing every intimate moment together. To Theo, Samantha is perfect.
"Her" explores the meaning of love and relationships as deeply as any movie this year. It's the most modern love story I've seen in a while, not because of the technology, but because of the confusion and frustrations that all couples encounter. As Theo falls for Samantha, he's also forced to confront his ex-wife (Rooney Mara), ventures on an awkward, unsuccessful blind date (Olivia Wilde), and comforts a friend (Amy Adams) as her own relationship collapses. We see all sides of the dating/marriage spectrum - and so does Samantha. She processes everything and decides for herself what to make of this foolish thing we call love.
Once again, Joaquin Phoenix proves himself to be one of the top actors working today. If you have any doubts about his past, check out this recent profile in the LA WEEKLY. He single-handedly carries the movie, often speaking alone on-screen, or simply reacting. It's an awesome performance and one of the year's best. Scarlett Johansson also gives a brilliant performance as Samantha, growing from simple commands to all the stages of love, and beyond. Her work is touching and very tangible, despite her physical absence.
"Her" is also a triumph of production and costume design. Set in an undisclosed year, the sets were designed by K. K. Barrett who creates a familiar, yet alien world. The movie combines elements of Downtown Los Angeles with Shanghai to create an overcrowded megalopolis where characters live vertically adrift in glass and steel. I kept marveling at the juxtaposition of wood and paper with the familiar in this new world.
One problem with the movie is that I imagined all the dangers that could possibly go wrong when falling in love with your operating system - yet none ever happen onscreen. "Her" needs a few extra jolts, especially when the Samantha gimmick wears thin. Although I suppose it's not that type of movie as the conflicts here are more subtle. Theo carries on, shifting slightly in his worldview, making the movie more cerebral. This is not a traditional big-screen romance between two beautiful movie stars - this is solitaire. As a result, it drags at times when the plot should be progressing. The nature of who we love, why and how are provocative musings that make this movie more art-house than multiplex.
Costume Display from Arclight Theater in Hollywood |
Thursday, December 19, 2013
The Great American Con: "American Hustle"
It's not a black and white world; it's all grey. So says Irving Rosenfeld, the somewhat real-life character played by Christian Bale in the 1970s era "American Hustle." It's a movie full of colorful suits, long Cadillacs, glitzy disco balls, and a soundtrack you've heard a million times. Did I mention this takes place in the 70s? I wasn't as impressed as apparently I should be. Maybe because I've already seen countless versions of the same movie, and this one offers no new surprises. For a movie about con-artists, you'd expect the trickery to be more grand - it's not.
Sure, it's a slick film filled with great actors, clearly having a blast. I'm sure it was fun to make, but like some of the more famous music of the era, it left me a bit empty. The story is based on the real Abscam Scandal, where FBI agents worked with a notorious con artist to trap corrupt politicians. The movie focuses on the triangle between the top con artist (Bale's Rosenfeld), his lover/partner (Amy Adams), and the eager-beaver FBI agent (Bradley Cooper). The movie tries to blur the lines between who's playing who, but to me it was never in doubt. Along the way we meet Rosenfeld's wife (Jennifer Lawrence overdoing it with a shifting accent), and the good guy politician (Jeremy Renner, at his earnest New Jersey Italian best).
After a fast-paced introductory 30 minutes where it creatively introduces Bale, Adams and the glory days of 1970s con-artistry, the movie gets severely bogged down with a hefty middle where the plot grows complicated, yet never too complex. The set-ups are numerous, but the payoffs never really land. I kept waiting for bigger reveals that never came, and as a result the movie simply glides along - one long steadicam set to Donna Summer.
As I've said, audiences have seen it all before - and better. Here's a good holiday party game: name all the 1970s era movies where marginalized outsiders fight/cheat/bend-the-rules to achieve their version of the American dream. Then rent those flicks and have a much better time.
"American Hustle" is, however, a bit more realistic than the other similar movies. It's not about mob killings, pornstars, or drug kingpins - it's about characters who are everyday dreamers that we all know. The problem is that the realism doesn't make it more cinematically enjoyable. Aside from the always excellent Christian Bale and Amy Adams, the rest of the cast struggle to animate these thin characters.
The movie is hurt by the attempts to be more psychological than it's predecessors. It touches on so many characters' lives that it never probes deep enough into any single one of them. By trying to maintain a certain level of con, the filmmakers withhold information that would otherwise prove more insightful. It all, therefore, feels a bit slight.
And who's the real villain here? The FBI? The politicians who barely appear? The movie never really takes a stand. A subplot revolves around the revitalization of Atlantic City, which is an intriguing prospect. Think "Casino" or "Bugsy" on the east coast, or even a more contemporary "Boardwalk Empire." But yet again this point is not further developed. Audiences are left wondering what happened to those casinos at that time. I realize that's not precisely what this movie is about, but why spend so much time with Jeremy Renner's crusading mayor and his dream?
Ultimately, it's the characters' inner demons that may (or may not) bring them down, yet those themes make better novels than movies. Apparently the temptations of Elton John and aviator sunglasses are too great to not render it all once again into a feature film. A great one? No, but it sure made a great trailer.
![]() |
Christian Bale, Bradley Cooper, Amy Adams, Jeremy Renner, Jenifer Lawrence |
After a fast-paced introductory 30 minutes where it creatively introduces Bale, Adams and the glory days of 1970s con-artistry, the movie gets severely bogged down with a hefty middle where the plot grows complicated, yet never too complex. The set-ups are numerous, but the payoffs never really land. I kept waiting for bigger reveals that never came, and as a result the movie simply glides along - one long steadicam set to Donna Summer.
As I've said, audiences have seen it all before - and better. Here's a good holiday party game: name all the 1970s era movies where marginalized outsiders fight/cheat/bend-the-rules to achieve their version of the American dream. Then rent those flicks and have a much better time.
"American Hustle" is, however, a bit more realistic than the other similar movies. It's not about mob killings, pornstars, or drug kingpins - it's about characters who are everyday dreamers that we all know. The problem is that the realism doesn't make it more cinematically enjoyable. Aside from the always excellent Christian Bale and Amy Adams, the rest of the cast struggle to animate these thin characters.
The movie is hurt by the attempts to be more psychological than it's predecessors. It touches on so many characters' lives that it never probes deep enough into any single one of them. By trying to maintain a certain level of con, the filmmakers withhold information that would otherwise prove more insightful. It all, therefore, feels a bit slight.
And who's the real villain here? The FBI? The politicians who barely appear? The movie never really takes a stand. A subplot revolves around the revitalization of Atlantic City, which is an intriguing prospect. Think "Casino" or "Bugsy" on the east coast, or even a more contemporary "Boardwalk Empire." But yet again this point is not further developed. Audiences are left wondering what happened to those casinos at that time. I realize that's not precisely what this movie is about, but why spend so much time with Jeremy Renner's crusading mayor and his dream?
Costume Display from Arclight Theater, Hollywood |
Tuesday, December 10, 2013
Like Dylan in the Movies, The Coen Brothers with "Inside Llewyn Davis"
Watching the new Coen Brothers movie "Inside Llewyn Davis" is the closest experience I've had to watching my own autobiography since "Ed Wood." No, I'm not a 1960s folk singer in Greenwich Village. Or a 1950s horror director. But both deal with frustrated, down-on-their luck artists, struggling for every penny, and feeling as if they're cursed. Yet these universal stories of failure and perseverance make great movies, and "Inside Llewyn Davis" is one of the year's best, highlighted by a transcendent actor.
The magnificent Oscar Isaac is a perfect blend of angst and sorrow as the fictional Llewyn Davis. This is the type of performance that turns actors into movie stars. I could not recall ever seeing him in a previous role (apparently he co-starred with Ryan Gosling in "Drive"), but he elevates this movie by creating a relatable scoundrel that resembles the best and worst in all of us.
The story takes place during one cold week in the folk singer's life as he: sleeps on friends' couches, attempts to launch his solo career, rights his wrongs with family and ex-lovers, and cares for a lost cat. Formerly of the folk duo Timlin and Davis, Llewyn is struggling to overcome the suicide of his partner. He's had bad luck with women, poor record sales, and only one real job - as a merchant marine. One ex-girlfriend describes him as King Midas's idiot brother.
Talented, yet volatile, emotional yet clueless, Llewyn trudges through winter without a coat or home to rest his weary guitar. The movie starts off as a musical (Mr. Isaac provides his own singing), twists into a road trip (with a cameo by a classic John Goodman jazz addict), and ends on a Kafkaesque puzzle. Ultimately it's a modern Odyssey (a familiar theme with the Coens), where the point is the journey, not the destination.
"Inside Llewyn Davis" is often funny, but sometimes painful. Make no mistake, this movie has a dark cloud hanging over it. Consider the names of the songs featured in the movie: "Hang Me, Oh Hang Me," "Fare Thee Well," and "The Death of Queen Jane." Weighty material, but the cast brings them to life by easing into the mood and singing every song in their entirety. Front and center, and in every scene, is Oscar Isaac's Llewyn Davis. He suffers and gets knocked down, but bounces right back up again.
Filled with beautiful cinematography, and an extensive playbill of memorable character-actors, the movie evokes both classic album covers and music history. Practically every character name is a reference to the folk and popular music scene. It's a fascinating movie that I'm certain will grow richer with repeated viewings. When it ended, I was willing to spend another two hours in this world.
Credit the Coen Brothers with imagining this original, complex character. Llewyn Davis's life, and the movie, are both open to interpretation - which is most fitting. "Inside Llewyn Davis" is best enjoyed over multiple viewings where interpretations can shift and deepen - like a good folk song.
For five underrated Coen Brothers movies CLICK HERE.
The magnificent Oscar Isaac is a perfect blend of angst and sorrow as the fictional Llewyn Davis. This is the type of performance that turns actors into movie stars. I could not recall ever seeing him in a previous role (apparently he co-starred with Ryan Gosling in "Drive"), but he elevates this movie by creating a relatable scoundrel that resembles the best and worst in all of us.
The story takes place during one cold week in the folk singer's life as he: sleeps on friends' couches, attempts to launch his solo career, rights his wrongs with family and ex-lovers, and cares for a lost cat. Formerly of the folk duo Timlin and Davis, Llewyn is struggling to overcome the suicide of his partner. He's had bad luck with women, poor record sales, and only one real job - as a merchant marine. One ex-girlfriend describes him as King Midas's idiot brother.
Talented, yet volatile, emotional yet clueless, Llewyn trudges through winter without a coat or home to rest his weary guitar. The movie starts off as a musical (Mr. Isaac provides his own singing), twists into a road trip (with a cameo by a classic John Goodman jazz addict), and ends on a Kafkaesque puzzle. Ultimately it's a modern Odyssey (a familiar theme with the Coens), where the point is the journey, not the destination.
"Inside Llewyn Davis" is often funny, but sometimes painful. Make no mistake, this movie has a dark cloud hanging over it. Consider the names of the songs featured in the movie: "Hang Me, Oh Hang Me," "Fare Thee Well," and "The Death of Queen Jane." Weighty material, but the cast brings them to life by easing into the mood and singing every song in their entirety. Front and center, and in every scene, is Oscar Isaac's Llewyn Davis. He suffers and gets knocked down, but bounces right back up again.
Filled with beautiful cinematography, and an extensive playbill of memorable character-actors, the movie evokes both classic album covers and music history. Practically every character name is a reference to the folk and popular music scene. It's a fascinating movie that I'm certain will grow richer with repeated viewings. When it ended, I was willing to spend another two hours in this world.
Credit the Coen Brothers with imagining this original, complex character. Llewyn Davis's life, and the movie, are both open to interpretation - which is most fitting. "Inside Llewyn Davis" is best enjoyed over multiple viewings where interpretations can shift and deepen - like a good folk song.
For five underrated Coen Brothers movies CLICK HERE.
Thursday, November 21, 2013
Oliver Stone Talks "JFK" at Special Screening
Why does John F. Kennedy matter? What have we learned about our nation from his assassination? These questions were on my mind last week as I attended the Cinerama Dome in Hollywood to see Oliver Stone host a screening of his 1991 epic "JFK."
These questions lingered long after the film ended, even after I sat glued to my seat for over 4 hours during the movie and introduction by the Academy Award winning writer-director. 50 years after the assassination, and 22 years after "JFK" nothing is any clearer. It's also apparent from the remarks by Mr. Stone that he's still trying to make sense of things. His latest project, "The Untold History of the United States" - the 10 part miniseries for cable TV - is yet another attempt to look at history with multiple perspectives, and take away the hope that informed citizens make a better democracy.
I guess the first question is why does Oliver Stone matter? As a filmmaker, he's very inspiring and influential due to his passion and style. He writes and directs movies that entertain, innovate, and dig deep into our collective history to find relevance today.
"JFK" is one of his finest. Viewed in 2013, it stands tall as fascinating and groundbreaking. An ambitious film that aims high and succeeds by telling a great story - a story audiences may think they know, but fall captive as the film surprises and thrills. It's beautifully photographed by Robert Richardson, and expertly edited by Pietro Scalia & Joe Hutshing, combining newsreel footage, re-enactments, and multiple film stocks to create a rich American tapestry. The acting is brilliant, led by Kevin Costner at his movie-star peak. I've seen the movie multiple times since 1991, yet marveled once again at the powerful imagery and resonant themes of American innocence lost.
"JFK" is such a kinetic work of pure cinema that it could be equally enjoyed with the sound off. Really - the images are that stunning and direct. That is except for the two mesmerizing speeches that form the centerpiece of the movie: Donald Sutherland's explanation of why and how Kennedy could be killed, and Kevin Costner's courtroom monologue where he debunks the single bullet theory attributed to a lone assassin.
Oliver Stone introduced the movie by first showing the Kennedy section from his new "Untold History" documentary (now available on Blu-ray). That selection summed up the radical ideas that Kennedy was implementing in 1963. This includes his idea that space exploration should be a multinational effort, the first nuclear arms control treaty (The Atmospheric Test-Ban Treaty), the goal to withdraw American troops from Vietnam by 1965, and a call to end the Cold War. He was viewed as soft on Communism, criticized for allowing the Berlin Wall to be built, and beat-up for the Bay of Pigs fiasco. Kennedy stood up to the military and the intelligence community, and truly wanted a progressive course for the country. All motives for a possible assassination, according to both the documentary and "JFK."
Oliver Stone remembered being 17 years old when JFK was killed. "We didn't question it," he said. "Nothing changed for me." It was his experience in Vietnam that changed him. "Vietnam was the result of the change of policies from Kennedy's death. I didn't know it on that day, of course. It took me another 10 years after the war to change. . . And until I got into this 'Untold History' in 2008, I was a dramatist interested in history, and now I've really gotten into it and learned a lot more."
The basis for the new documentary (made with historian Peter Kuznick) started with the policies that Kennedy wanted to change back in '63. Mr. Stone found himself, in 2008, beating his head against a wall asking, "Why are we going back to these wars over and over again? It seems like we don't learn anything." In 2008, Mr. Stone wanted to learn what the pattern was; whether George W. Bush was the aberration, or was he just an example of the same policies since World War II. Sadly, he found out that was the case, and that Kennedy was the only president we've had in the last 70 years that has tried to make a significant change. Oliver Stone really wants to understand what life in America is about. "We're at a very strange time now, when you have the NSA listening in on everything we do. It's like Jim Morrison said, 'This is the weirdest life I've ever known.' As a dramatist, I love to see the tension that exists. If this empire can still pull it off. With all this military muscle. I don't know this thing can last."
Regarding the assassination, Oliver Stone is concerned that the mainstream media continues to unquestionably perpetuate the lone assassin/single bullet story. "It's crazy," he says. "It defies common sense. What you see with your own eyes [in the Zapruder film], back and to the left. And this concept of firing three bolt-action shots out of the sixth floor at Kennedy; and hitting seven wounds in two different people with one bullet is insane. It's so preposterous. Lewis Carroll is rolling over in his grave. I can't believe all these smart people in the United States establishment - The New York Times, Washington Post - with all these people writing about it and I'm the only one allowed on television to say anything different. It's amazing the consensus we've reached, we've become so conservative in this country, it's depressing."
Although the debate still rages, it does appear from much of this 50th Anniversary talk that Oswald is the accepted culprit by the public and the media. Consider this recent LA Times Editorial from a member of the Warren Commission, justifying the lone-assassin theory.
Oliver Stone wants you to make up your own mind. He describes the facts that disprove Lee Harvey Oswald as the lone assassin, and the information that shows the evidence of a massive cover-up. He encourages all citizens to do their own research, and recommends the following books:
Jim DiEugenio "Reclaiming Parkland"
Jim DiEugenio "Destiny Betrayed"
James Douglass "JFK and the Unspeakable"
John Newman "Oswald and the CIA"
Cyril Wecht "Cause of Death"
Joan Mellen "A Farewell to Justice"
Gary Aguilar "Trauma Room One"
Robert Groden "Absolute Proof"
Gearld McKnight "Breach of Trust"
So why does President Kennedy and his assassination matter? His death on November 22, 1963 was a turning point (neither the first nor the last), when the country could have fulfilled its promise as a beacon of new ideas. Instead, hope gave way to subsequent decades of war and conservatism, greed and corruption. Maybe the '60s as we know it would never have happened - both the bad and the good. Or was everything inevitable? A world without war - seems unlikely. Whether in drama or reality, conflict is inevitable. An alternate history is all just science fiction.
Oliver Stone ends "JFK" with a single title card that reads: 'What's past is prologue.'
Even if we learn history, are we doomed to repeat it?
These questions lingered long after the film ended, even after I sat glued to my seat for over 4 hours during the movie and introduction by the Academy Award winning writer-director. 50 years after the assassination, and 22 years after "JFK" nothing is any clearer. It's also apparent from the remarks by Mr. Stone that he's still trying to make sense of things. His latest project, "The Untold History of the United States" - the 10 part miniseries for cable TV - is yet another attempt to look at history with multiple perspectives, and take away the hope that informed citizens make a better democracy.
I guess the first question is why does Oliver Stone matter? As a filmmaker, he's very inspiring and influential due to his passion and style. He writes and directs movies that entertain, innovate, and dig deep into our collective history to find relevance today.
"JFK" is one of his finest. Viewed in 2013, it stands tall as fascinating and groundbreaking. An ambitious film that aims high and succeeds by telling a great story - a story audiences may think they know, but fall captive as the film surprises and thrills. It's beautifully photographed by Robert Richardson, and expertly edited by Pietro Scalia & Joe Hutshing, combining newsreel footage, re-enactments, and multiple film stocks to create a rich American tapestry. The acting is brilliant, led by Kevin Costner at his movie-star peak. I've seen the movie multiple times since 1991, yet marveled once again at the powerful imagery and resonant themes of American innocence lost.
"JFK" is such a kinetic work of pure cinema that it could be equally enjoyed with the sound off. Really - the images are that stunning and direct. That is except for the two mesmerizing speeches that form the centerpiece of the movie: Donald Sutherland's explanation of why and how Kennedy could be killed, and Kevin Costner's courtroom monologue where he debunks the single bullet theory attributed to a lone assassin.
Oliver Stone introduced the movie by first showing the Kennedy section from his new "Untold History" documentary (now available on Blu-ray). That selection summed up the radical ideas that Kennedy was implementing in 1963. This includes his idea that space exploration should be a multinational effort, the first nuclear arms control treaty (The Atmospheric Test-Ban Treaty), the goal to withdraw American troops from Vietnam by 1965, and a call to end the Cold War. He was viewed as soft on Communism, criticized for allowing the Berlin Wall to be built, and beat-up for the Bay of Pigs fiasco. Kennedy stood up to the military and the intelligence community, and truly wanted a progressive course for the country. All motives for a possible assassination, according to both the documentary and "JFK."
Oliver Stone remembered being 17 years old when JFK was killed. "We didn't question it," he said. "Nothing changed for me." It was his experience in Vietnam that changed him. "Vietnam was the result of the change of policies from Kennedy's death. I didn't know it on that day, of course. It took me another 10 years after the war to change. . . And until I got into this 'Untold History' in 2008, I was a dramatist interested in history, and now I've really gotten into it and learned a lot more."
The basis for the new documentary (made with historian Peter Kuznick) started with the policies that Kennedy wanted to change back in '63. Mr. Stone found himself, in 2008, beating his head against a wall asking, "Why are we going back to these wars over and over again? It seems like we don't learn anything." In 2008, Mr. Stone wanted to learn what the pattern was; whether George W. Bush was the aberration, or was he just an example of the same policies since World War II. Sadly, he found out that was the case, and that Kennedy was the only president we've had in the last 70 years that has tried to make a significant change. Oliver Stone really wants to understand what life in America is about. "We're at a very strange time now, when you have the NSA listening in on everything we do. It's like Jim Morrison said, 'This is the weirdest life I've ever known.' As a dramatist, I love to see the tension that exists. If this empire can still pull it off. With all this military muscle. I don't know this thing can last."
![]() |
4 Disc Blu-ray set now on sale |
Although the debate still rages, it does appear from much of this 50th Anniversary talk that Oswald is the accepted culprit by the public and the media. Consider this recent LA Times Editorial from a member of the Warren Commission, justifying the lone-assassin theory.
Oliver Stone wants you to make up your own mind. He describes the facts that disprove Lee Harvey Oswald as the lone assassin, and the information that shows the evidence of a massive cover-up. He encourages all citizens to do their own research, and recommends the following books:
Jim DiEugenio "Reclaiming Parkland"
Jim DiEugenio "Destiny Betrayed"
James Douglass "JFK and the Unspeakable"
John Newman "Oswald and the CIA"
Cyril Wecht "Cause of Death"
Joan Mellen "A Farewell to Justice"
Gary Aguilar "Trauma Room One"
Robert Groden "Absolute Proof"
Gearld McKnight "Breach of Trust"
So why does President Kennedy and his assassination matter? His death on November 22, 1963 was a turning point (neither the first nor the last), when the country could have fulfilled its promise as a beacon of new ideas. Instead, hope gave way to subsequent decades of war and conservatism, greed and corruption. Maybe the '60s as we know it would never have happened - both the bad and the good. Or was everything inevitable? A world without war - seems unlikely. Whether in drama or reality, conflict is inevitable. An alternate history is all just science fiction.
Oliver Stone ends "JFK" with a single title card that reads: 'What's past is prologue.'
Even if we learn history, are we doomed to repeat it?
Tuesday, November 19, 2013
Alexander Payne's "Nebraska" - A Story of America
At first glance Alexander Payne's "Nebraska" might be described as a Mid-Western, but in reality it's an American. And the best movie about Americans all year. Real, working class, non-superhero citizens are the backbone of this excellent movie which captures the complexities and details of life in the post-recession landscape. "Nebraska" is a movie that makes you think: about our aging parents, about lost dreams, and about the new generation with substantially bleaker prospects than the old one. It takes place in the literal center of the country, but the story is universally American.
"Nebraska" is about Woody Grant (Bruce Dern), who travels with his forty-something son David (Will Forte) to his home state of Nebraska to claim a million dollar sweepstakes prize that may or may not exist. Along the way, they reconnect with old friends and family who reveal hidden truths about Woody's life. David learns that his father is much more complicated than the aloof alcoholic he - and the audience - takes him for. Over the course of one weekend, Woody and David's bickering gives way to a deeper understanding about family heritage and communal history that enlighten and invigorate both men.
Further complicating matters are the long-lost relatives who now believe Woody is a millionaire. Having lost contact with Woody's family for over a decade, they make no qualms about now asking for a share of the riches. The most stupefying and villainous are Woody's nephews Bart and Cole. They love to drink beer and talk cars, and don't appear to have any sort of job. They mock David for his Subaru wagon and for taking 2 days to drive 750 miles, yet spend their weekends doing roadside "community service" after a sexual assault charge. Their aggressive attempts to snatch a share of their Uncle's jackpot are both sad and hilarious.
Photographed
in black-and-white across Montana, Wyoming, South Dakota and Nebraska,
the movie is full of authentic images depicting small-town and rural
life in the 21st Century. The terrific script by Bob Nelson is filled
with spot-on sayings and down-home characters that make this story both
funny and poignant. This rich portrait is anchored by Bruce Dern's
phenomenal performance. The 77 year old actor has worked with everyone
from Alfred Hitchcock to Quentin Tarantino, and brings all his
experience to create a touching, layered father that is an archetypal Old Man of the United States. Mr. Dern uses his eyes, his walk, his gestures, and even his grunts to convey his entire memory, filled with regret, disappointment, and the disbelief that time and tide wait for no man.
At its heart, "Nebraska" is a father-and-son story. David harbors resentment toward Woody for caring too little and drinking too much. Woody feels David has not amounted to anything, relegated to "selling record players" at a local store. Yet David knows that he's not all that different form his dad, and with no wife or house to call his own, David faces an even bleaker future. The road trip to Nebraska is what they both need; David needs to connect with his father, and Woody needs to get away from his meaningless existence and feel alive once again.
The entire movie will hit close to home for anyone with family outside the big cities. Every argument or insult has been said by real families for a hundred years. The houses and taverns have a comfortable lived-in feel that might be your aunt's or a former business partner's. What makes this movie brilliant is that no matter how crazy things get, or how bizarre people act, we as an audience recognize ourselves. Every character is richly drawn with cracks and faults that could be any of our relatives. Like the landscape where Woody Grant was born and raised, "Nebraska" is our home too.
Greek-American director Alexander Payne has now made six movies and every single one is great. I recommend them all, and be sure to read my review of his first movie "Citizen Ruth."
"Nebraska" is about Woody Grant (Bruce Dern), who travels with his forty-something son David (Will Forte) to his home state of Nebraska to claim a million dollar sweepstakes prize that may or may not exist. Along the way, they reconnect with old friends and family who reveal hidden truths about Woody's life. David learns that his father is much more complicated than the aloof alcoholic he - and the audience - takes him for. Over the course of one weekend, Woody and David's bickering gives way to a deeper understanding about family heritage and communal history that enlighten and invigorate both men.
Further complicating matters are the long-lost relatives who now believe Woody is a millionaire. Having lost contact with Woody's family for over a decade, they make no qualms about now asking for a share of the riches. The most stupefying and villainous are Woody's nephews Bart and Cole. They love to drink beer and talk cars, and don't appear to have any sort of job. They mock David for his Subaru wagon and for taking 2 days to drive 750 miles, yet spend their weekends doing roadside "community service" after a sexual assault charge. Their aggressive attempts to snatch a share of their Uncle's jackpot are both sad and hilarious.
![]() |
Will Forte and Bruce Dern |
At its heart, "Nebraska" is a father-and-son story. David harbors resentment toward Woody for caring too little and drinking too much. Woody feels David has not amounted to anything, relegated to "selling record players" at a local store. Yet David knows that he's not all that different form his dad, and with no wife or house to call his own, David faces an even bleaker future. The road trip to Nebraska is what they both need; David needs to connect with his father, and Woody needs to get away from his meaningless existence and feel alive once again.
The entire movie will hit close to home for anyone with family outside the big cities. Every argument or insult has been said by real families for a hundred years. The houses and taverns have a comfortable lived-in feel that might be your aunt's or a former business partner's. What makes this movie brilliant is that no matter how crazy things get, or how bizarre people act, we as an audience recognize ourselves. Every character is richly drawn with cracks and faults that could be any of our relatives. Like the landscape where Woody Grant was born and raised, "Nebraska" is our home too.
Greek-American director Alexander Payne has now made six movies and every single one is great. I recommend them all, and be sure to read my review of his first movie "Citizen Ruth."
Thursday, November 14, 2013
"Cold Turkey" Writer-Director Will Slocombe Interview
"Cold Turkey" is an independent comedy about a fractured family uncovering secrets during an explosive Thanksgiving. It stars Peter Bogdanovich as the professor patriarch, Cheryl Hines as the mom, with Alicia Witt, Sonya Walger, and Ashton Holmes as the grown children. It is now available on-demand at iTunes, Amazon and Xbox, and comes out in select theaters Friday, November 15th.
It's a very realistic, detailed peek into the modern family. This dark comedy is the personal vision of writer-director Will Slocombe. I spoke with him about this fictionalized, semi-autobiographical story:
Michael Carvaines: Aside from your own family, what were some of your influences?
Will Slocombe: "12 Angry Men" because of the single, tense location. "The Graduate" because of the funny-sad Southern California feel. And Whit Stillman's "Metropolitan" which is also a cheap movie about expensive people.
MC: Describe your writing process.
WS: It's a personal story, but the situation is made up. Initially, it took me only 10 days to write, but then another year to improve. Of course, in many ways it's a story that took 29 years to write. I always knew we wouldn't have a lot money to make this movie, so I had to find creative ways to tell the story with so many characters. It turned out that keeping it all in one location was the best way.
MC: How did you assemble such a great cast?
WS: I had a brilliant casting director: Paul Ruddy. He knew agents and managers, and actors I did not. I never would have foreseen in the writing process that Peter Bogdanovich and Cheryl Hines would play the parents but it worked out great. Better than expected.
MC: Is Peter Bogdanovich's character based on a real person?
WS: Elements of my own father. They're both foreign policy experts. But we lived in Washington DC, not Pasadena. And my dad was not a Stanford professor. The facts are different, but I was going for an emotional truth.
MC: Peter Bogdanovich, of course, started as a film critic and has written several books on movie history. Did he offer any advice?
WS: He actually started as an actor when he was 15 with Stella Adler. Then he became a critic, and then a director. So he's come full circle. But he was great. He showed up everyday wearing his ascot. Occasionally, after a take he would lean over and say in his serious, knowing voice: "You're not going to use that."
MC: He's terrific in this role, and it's definitely worth checking out. Thanks again, and good luck with the opening.
WS: Thank you, and best of luck with your films.
"Cold Turkey" opens in Los Angeles theaters this weekend, then rolls out across the country in coming weeks. For more information visit the official website: http://www.coldturkeymovie.com/
It's a very realistic, detailed peek into the modern family. This dark comedy is the personal vision of writer-director Will Slocombe. I spoke with him about this fictionalized, semi-autobiographical story:
Michael Carvaines: Aside from your own family, what were some of your influences?
Will Slocombe: "12 Angry Men" because of the single, tense location. "The Graduate" because of the funny-sad Southern California feel. And Whit Stillman's "Metropolitan" which is also a cheap movie about expensive people.
![]() | |
Peter Bogdanovich and Will Slocombe |
WS: It's a personal story, but the situation is made up. Initially, it took me only 10 days to write, but then another year to improve. Of course, in many ways it's a story that took 29 years to write. I always knew we wouldn't have a lot money to make this movie, so I had to find creative ways to tell the story with so many characters. It turned out that keeping it all in one location was the best way.
MC: How did you assemble such a great cast?
WS: I had a brilliant casting director: Paul Ruddy. He knew agents and managers, and actors I did not. I never would have foreseen in the writing process that Peter Bogdanovich and Cheryl Hines would play the parents but it worked out great. Better than expected.
![]() |
Cheryl Hines and Peter Bogdanovich |
WS: Elements of my own father. They're both foreign policy experts. But we lived in Washington DC, not Pasadena. And my dad was not a Stanford professor. The facts are different, but I was going for an emotional truth.
MC: Peter Bogdanovich, of course, started as a film critic and has written several books on movie history. Did he offer any advice?
WS: He actually started as an actor when he was 15 with Stella Adler. Then he became a critic, and then a director. So he's come full circle. But he was great. He showed up everyday wearing his ascot. Occasionally, after a take he would lean over and say in his serious, knowing voice: "You're not going to use that."
MC: He's terrific in this role, and it's definitely worth checking out. Thanks again, and good luck with the opening.
WS: Thank you, and best of luck with your films.
"Cold Turkey" opens in Los Angeles theaters this weekend, then rolls out across the country in coming weeks. For more information visit the official website: http://www.coldturkeymovie.com/
Thursday, November 7, 2013
"In Organic We Trust" - Food Documentary Director Kip Pastor Interview
As a
father of a young toddler, I'm often faced with the decision to buy organic
food. I've heard various accounts on the issue, know the most
contaminated vegetables, and feel skeptical every time I see a huge food
conglomerate promoting their latest organic offering. I was excited to
watch and learn some helpful ideas from Kip Pastor's new documentary that
investigates these claims. His movie, "In Organic We Trust" is
now available on Amazon, iTunes and wherever digital movies are virtually sold.
We spoke
last week over fair-trade organic coffee.
Michael
Carvaines: What inspired you to make a documentary about
organic food?
Kip
Pastor: When I decided to get into film, there were two
things that attracted me the most. One was the storytelling, and the
second was the idea of disseminating important social messages to a broader
audience. And food is an amazing confluence of every single socio,
political, and economic issue. It touches every single one. And
corresponds to what we do every day: eat. I've been watching food
documentaries for a long time, and I saw two that were inspirational:
"The Future of Food" which introduced me to GMOs, and "King
Corn." The storytelling was great, the characters were great, but neither
one talked about organic. It seemed to me that this was something people
wanted and hadn't had yet. And all these things combined to say this is
the first film I want to do. It's a long answer, I know.
MC:
It's a good answer. Did you worry that you might be preaching to the choir?
KP:
Documentaries in general tend to preach to the choir, but every now and then
you get an outlier, someone whose life is really changed by a film. I
knew that going in. But documentaries also excite the base. The
choir knows a lot, but they also need new information, new excuses to get
together. And with today's distribution, a lot more people see it than
just the choir.
MC:
Did you grow up eating organic food, or did something change during your life?
KP:
My mom was always concerned with nutrition, so we never had sugary cereals in
the house. But I still ate at McDonald's after baseball games. But I
learned about nutrition, the importance of fruits and vegetables, and whole
grains, but I didn't learn about pesticides or soil. That didn't kick in
until I moved to California which brought me closer to where food is
produced. That illuminated my views on food and agriculture. It
wasn't one event, it was a compilation of life experience. And frankly,
that's what this documentary journey is. You don't turn a film around in
six months. This movie took three years from start to finish.
MC:
Did you begin the filmmaking process with a written script?
KP:
For documentaries, it's particularly hard to write a script, but I had to write
proposals for fundraising and grants. And I wrote them different ways, as
first person, with specific characters, and the final film covers most of the
issues that I set out to address. The writing part is fundamental
though. You can create the spin on
the page, but when you go out and start shooting, the story evolves. And it evolves again during the
edit. Just like in narrative
filmmaking, the story is written three times – the page, on set, and lastly, in
the editing room. I tried to make a very solution-based film, which
documentaries tend not to be. They tend to scare the crap out of you, and
present solutions at the end over text. My movie is not about fear.
Half of the movie is about solutions. And some of these were solutions we
didn't know we were going to get when we started. That’s really the beauty of the process.
MC:
The movie shows how your interview requests were turned down by the USDA.
Were you denied access to any food companies?
KP:
Yeah, it was a shame about the USDA. They agreed to an interview and
approved questions, but then canceled at the last minute. They said they
would respond in writing, and still never responded. I had basic
questions I wanted to ask them like what is 'Certified Organic?' For an
organization that is supposed to protect and support average Americans, they
failed. Their lack of transparency
is unacceptable, and they got dinged for it in the movie. Most other
companies wouldn't even respond. Not even a 'No thank you.' I was
interested in exploring GMOs, but I realized very quickly it would be
impossible to make a balanced movie where I couldn't get an interview.
And I think some other documentary filmmakers have made it difficult to get
interviews - people are very worried you will skew what they say.
Corporations have nothing to gain by speaking on camera. And with most of
the really big corporate-owned organic companies I'd want to be exposing
something. Most of them have something to hide and something to lose, so
there's no benefit for them to speak in this film. But I
think there are always creative work-arounds.
MC: The section in your film about school lunches was very interesting, because it seems like the best place to start nutrition education. What did you learn about those programs?
KP: We hadn’t planned on getting a school lunch
program. It was a beautiful, spontaneous part. One of our other characters
said, 'Have you talked to Chef Bobo? You have to!' So we did. You take a
private school in Manhattan that can afford a great chef to prepare healthy,
natural lunches, and you can teach children how to eat healthier. It was
really an incubator. Chef Bobo
would train the other chefs how to cook on a budget and send them out and
become a head chef at other schools, usually public. And they take all
that knowledge about how to order, how to create variety and make it healthy
for a lot less money. The hardest and strongest lesson of the journey for
me was that we're in trouble. The way we grow and process food is not
good for us or the environment.
But we can change that. And
if you can get school gardens, that will help change school lunch
programs. If you change what kids eat in school and what they know about
food, then in one generation we're going to take care of so many public health
issues.
MC:
So is it better to buy organic food no matter what, or is it better to always
buy from a local, farmers' market?
KP:
When we were editing the film, my editors would say to me, 'Well is it good or
not good?' Because for storytelling we need to make it black or
white. But unfortunately it's a gray area, and no one wants to hear that organic
is much more complicated than a simple 'yes' or 'no.' The question of how
do you buy and what do you buy is a difficult one. If it's a certified
farmers' market, you can rest assured that if they have an organic sign it's
truly certified organic. But you can also talk to the farmers, because no
one is going to lie about what they do. And nine times out of ten, the
farmers there have smaller farms and they are very conscientious of what
they're spraying or inputting because it's where they live. They don’t want to be living in toxic
pesticides either. For me, I buy from farmers that I talk to. When
it comes to organic, you're either buying for the environment or your own
personal health. If it's for your own health, you can really stick to the
'Dirty Dozen'/'Clean Fifteen' fruits and vegetables that have the most pesticide
residues [according to the Environmental
Working Group]. Those are the ones to buy organic, and that list
changes every year. If it's for the environment, then you should be
buying local organic. And that may cost you an arm and a leg, but it
depends on where you live and what season it is. For me, I try to buy
seasonally, which is very important.
MC:
What's your next project?
KP:
I'm making another film that I've already been working on for a year.
It's a documentary called "Canary in the Kitchen." It's about
the toxicity of everyday things. We're looking at seven different
chemicals that we interact with on a daily basis. It's about where they
come from, what they do to the environment, and what they do to us.
MC:
Great, more fear for parents.
KP:
Don't worry, it will be solution based.
For more
information on "In Organic We Trust," please visit the movie's
official website at http://www.inorganicwetrust.org
Monday, November 4, 2013
Matthew McConaughey, Jared Leto shine in "Dallas Buyers Club"
It took 20 years to finally bring "Dallas Buyers Club" to life and it was well worth the wait. The behind-the-scenes struggle to produce the movie is a fascinating tale that The LA Times covered HERE. It's a testament to the perseverance of screenwriter Craig Borten and his excellent script, which is filled with memorable characters brilliantly portrayed by Matthew McConaughey and Jared Leto.
"Dallas Buyers Club" tells the true story of Ron Woodroof (McConaughey), a hard-drinking, womanizing buck who was diagnosed with HIV in 1985. He was given 30 days to live. As he traveled the world seeking out unapproved medication, he brought hope to the afflicted, fought the FDA, and lived for 2500 more days. He partnered with the transgender Rayon (Leto) and the two formed the Dallas Buyers Club - an ad-hoc health clinic dispensing proteins, vitamins, and pills to AIDS patients with no other options.
It's a captivating look at many complex issues. It examines society's relationship with a new, stigmatized disease. It also focuses on the American health care system's process of drug trials and approvals. Fortunately, the story never strays from Woodroof, the working-class crusader whose positive outlook lifts the film whenever the issues get too heavy. "Ain't nothing out there that can kill Ron Woodroof in 30 days," he tells the doctors as he turns his back and begins his life's mission.
Matthew McConaughey's career rejuvenation has been astonishing - and also very enjoyable. Add this movie to a darker, subtler performance in this year's wonderful "Mud," and throw in the two great roles from last year ("Bernie" and "Magic Mike") and he's been on a run unlike any contemporary actor. At first his Woodroof is unpredictable, explosive, cunning and mean. He slowly learns that his way is no way to live, and certainly not the way he wants to die. Mr. McConaughey manages to win the audience through humor as he battles an unjust system preventing a dying man from all available remedies. As he grows, he gives strangers hope and discovers profound friendships. He's at his most hilarious when he poses as a priest to smuggle medicine across the US-Mexico border. We feel his pain and triumphs as he utilizes talents he didn't know he possessed.
The true revelation in "Dallas Buyers Club" is Jared Leto - remember him? He took a six year break from acting to focus on his band (30 Seconds to Mars) and returns here with a tour-de-force portrayal as a transgender AIDS patient. It's touching work, as he is completely believable in the role of Rayon. The burden falls on Mr. Leto to win over McConaughey's Woodruff by teasing, insulting and suffering. Ultimately, he transforms the previously homophobic Woodruff into an empathetic progressive hero.
The movie was directed by Jean-Marc Vallée, a Canadian filmmaker whose terrific film "C.R.A.Z.Y." was a cult hit back in 2005. He pulls off a delicate balance with "Dallas Buyers Club" as it entertains while gently provokes. Unlike most movies, it addresses death in a direct, adult way. Sure, people die in movies all the time, but rarely is mortality ever explored at any length. In this one, the filmmakers force the viewer to consider the implications of what dying means. By contrasting it with the vibrancy of Woodroof's life and attitudes, it presents a way of coping. It shows us how to live.
Heavy stuff, indeed. But as I said, when the pendulum swings too far to one side, there's no actor today like Matthew McConaughey who can crack up the audience with a good ol' Texas metaphor. In the end, this is Ron Woodroof's movie. It's great that the man finally gets the recognition he deserves.
"Dallas Buyers Club" tells the true story of Ron Woodroof (McConaughey), a hard-drinking, womanizing buck who was diagnosed with HIV in 1985. He was given 30 days to live. As he traveled the world seeking out unapproved medication, he brought hope to the afflicted, fought the FDA, and lived for 2500 more days. He partnered with the transgender Rayon (Leto) and the two formed the Dallas Buyers Club - an ad-hoc health clinic dispensing proteins, vitamins, and pills to AIDS patients with no other options.
It's a captivating look at many complex issues. It examines society's relationship with a new, stigmatized disease. It also focuses on the American health care system's process of drug trials and approvals. Fortunately, the story never strays from Woodroof, the working-class crusader whose positive outlook lifts the film whenever the issues get too heavy. "Ain't nothing out there that can kill Ron Woodroof in 30 days," he tells the doctors as he turns his back and begins his life's mission.
Matthew McConaughey's career rejuvenation has been astonishing - and also very enjoyable. Add this movie to a darker, subtler performance in this year's wonderful "Mud," and throw in the two great roles from last year ("Bernie" and "Magic Mike") and he's been on a run unlike any contemporary actor. At first his Woodroof is unpredictable, explosive, cunning and mean. He slowly learns that his way is no way to live, and certainly not the way he wants to die. Mr. McConaughey manages to win the audience through humor as he battles an unjust system preventing a dying man from all available remedies. As he grows, he gives strangers hope and discovers profound friendships. He's at his most hilarious when he poses as a priest to smuggle medicine across the US-Mexico border. We feel his pain and triumphs as he utilizes talents he didn't know he possessed.
The true revelation in "Dallas Buyers Club" is Jared Leto - remember him? He took a six year break from acting to focus on his band (30 Seconds to Mars) and returns here with a tour-de-force portrayal as a transgender AIDS patient. It's touching work, as he is completely believable in the role of Rayon. The burden falls on Mr. Leto to win over McConaughey's Woodruff by teasing, insulting and suffering. Ultimately, he transforms the previously homophobic Woodruff into an empathetic progressive hero.
The movie was directed by Jean-Marc Vallée, a Canadian filmmaker whose terrific film "C.R.A.Z.Y." was a cult hit back in 2005. He pulls off a delicate balance with "Dallas Buyers Club" as it entertains while gently provokes. Unlike most movies, it addresses death in a direct, adult way. Sure, people die in movies all the time, but rarely is mortality ever explored at any length. In this one, the filmmakers force the viewer to consider the implications of what dying means. By contrasting it with the vibrancy of Woodroof's life and attitudes, it presents a way of coping. It shows us how to live.
Heavy stuff, indeed. But as I said, when the pendulum swings too far to one side, there's no actor today like Matthew McConaughey who can crack up the audience with a good ol' Texas metaphor. In the end, this is Ron Woodroof's movie. It's great that the man finally gets the recognition he deserves.
Thursday, October 31, 2013
Gaz Alazraki Director of "Nosotros Los Nobles" ("We Are The Nobles")
In Mexico, the last 6 months have
been a box office boom. What’s
unusual is that filmgoers are flocking
to the Mexican movies produced in their home country, not the Hollywood blockbusters. Leading the renaissance is "Nosotros Los Nobles" ("We
Are The Nobles") directed by Gaz
Alazraki. In March it broke the 11
year old all-time Mexican record, until it was replaced last month by a new
box office champ.
“We Are The Nobles” opens in
the United States on Friday, November 1st. The
satiric comedy tells the story of a rich father who teaches his three kids a
lesson through an elaborate hoax where the family loses their fortune. I spoke with Gaz Alazraki who himself comes from a prestigious Mexican family, but learned harsh truths while studying in the U.S.
Michael Carvaines: Congratulations on all your success.
Gaz Alazraki: Thank you. It’s
an exciting time right now.
Audiences have renewed faith in movies made in Mexico, by Mexican
filmmakers. It’s great that they
are taking these chances because it opens the door for more opportunity.
MC: Where did your idea originate?
GA: I attended film school in the United States and worked as an
intern. I was a nobody and was
hazed, and experienced a meritocracy for the first time in my life. When I moved back to Mexico, I wanted
to live according to my means. But
no else did. Certainly not my
friends who worked for their family businesses. They behaved very entitled, very demanding. Not sensitive to their workers. They wouldn’t have acted that way if
they had seen what I’d seen. They
never were on the other side. I
wanted to capture that feeling.
GA: The old screwball comedies of the
1930s. Great Depression-era cinema
had a way of skewering the rich, and I wanted to capture that feeling of rich
vs. poor. So movies like “It
Happened One Night,” “His Girl Friday,” and “The Philadelphia Story.” I also watched the comedies from 1980s
to develop the rhythms of the classic comedic structure. “Trading Places” and “Arthur” were two
big influences.
GA: I spent two years writing the script. Revising over 18 drafts. When I hit a wall, I brought in two
screenwriters to collaborate. Then
in the editing room, I removed 30 minutes that I wished I’d cut out from the
script. It would have saved time
and money.
MC: Yeah, it’s funny how that works in hindsight. Were you consciously writing for a
Mexican audience? Or isn’t there a difference?
GA: I wanted to write universal characters, but in a Mexican
way. Good archetypes, that the
world would appreciate. I didn’t
want to alienate other countries.
In that regard I was influenced by “Clueless” which is set in Los
Angeles, but showed characters anyone could relate to.
GA: It proved to be harder than I expected. I showed it to various distributors who
are used to foreign films being more art-house. This was more “Hollywood” so they didn’t know how to market
it. Then some of the Spanish
language companies weren’t sure because it doesn’t have major stars in it. Finally the movie’s getting released in
the U.S. but only in limited markets at first. The distributor has to protect their investment because of
piracy concerns, since it’s been out for so long in Mexico.
GA: Several projects.
I’m planning a TV series in Mexico. I’ve also started my own production company for Mexican
films and filmmakers. And I’m also
developing an English language film for U.S. actors. So a little of everything. I’m chasing all of them.
Click HERE for showtimes and tickets in your area.
Click HERE for showtimes and tickets in your area.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)