These questions lingered long after the film ended, even after I sat glued to my seat for over 4 hours during the movie and introduction by the Academy Award winning writer-director. 50 years after the assassination, and 22 years after "JFK" nothing is any clearer. It's also apparent from the remarks by Mr. Stone that he's still trying to make sense of things. His latest project, "The Untold History of the United States" - the 10 part miniseries for cable TV - is yet another attempt to look at history with multiple perspectives, and take away the hope that informed citizens make a better democracy.
I guess the first question is why does Oliver Stone matter? As a filmmaker, he's very inspiring and influential due to his passion and style. He writes and directs movies that entertain, innovate, and dig deep into our collective history to find relevance today.
"JFK" is one of his finest. Viewed in 2013, it stands tall as fascinating and groundbreaking. An ambitious film that aims high and succeeds by telling a great story - a story audiences may think they know, but fall captive as the film surprises and thrills. It's beautifully photographed by Robert Richardson, and expertly edited by Pietro Scalia & Joe Hutshing, combining newsreel footage, re-enactments, and multiple film stocks to create a rich American tapestry. The acting is brilliant, led by Kevin Costner at his movie-star peak. I've seen the movie multiple times since 1991, yet marveled once again at the powerful imagery and resonant themes of American innocence lost.
"JFK" is such a kinetic work of pure cinema that it could be equally enjoyed with the sound off. Really - the images are that stunning and direct. That is except for the two mesmerizing speeches that form the centerpiece of the movie: Donald Sutherland's explanation of why and how Kennedy could be killed, and Kevin Costner's courtroom monologue where he debunks the single bullet theory attributed to a lone assassin.
Oliver Stone introduced the movie by first showing the Kennedy section from his new "Untold History" documentary (now available on Blu-ray). That selection summed up the radical ideas that Kennedy was implementing in 1963. This includes his idea that space exploration should be a multinational effort, the first nuclear arms control treaty (The Atmospheric Test-Ban Treaty), the goal to withdraw American troops from Vietnam by 1965, and a call to end the Cold War. He was viewed as soft on Communism, criticized for allowing the Berlin Wall to be built, and beat-up for the Bay of Pigs fiasco. Kennedy stood up to the military and the intelligence community, and truly wanted a progressive course for the country. All motives for a possible assassination, according to both the documentary and "JFK."
Oliver Stone remembered being 17 years old when JFK was killed. "We didn't question it," he said. "Nothing changed for me." It was his experience in Vietnam that changed him. "Vietnam was the result of the change of policies from Kennedy's death. I didn't know it on that day, of course. It took me another 10 years after the war to change. . . And until I got into this 'Untold History' in 2008, I was a dramatist interested in history, and now I've really gotten into it and learned a lot more."
The basis for the new documentary (made with historian Peter Kuznick) started with the policies that Kennedy wanted to change back in '63. Mr. Stone found himself, in 2008, beating his head against a wall asking, "Why are we going back to these wars over and over again? It seems like we don't learn anything." In 2008, Mr. Stone wanted to learn what the pattern was; whether George W. Bush was the aberration, or was he just an example of the same policies since World War II. Sadly, he found out that was the case, and that Kennedy was the only president we've had in the last 70 years that has tried to make a significant change. Oliver Stone really wants to understand what life in America is about. "We're at a very strange time now, when you have the NSA listening in on everything we do. It's like Jim Morrison said, 'This is the weirdest life I've ever known.' As a dramatist, I love to see the tension that exists. If this empire can still pull it off. With all this military muscle. I don't know this thing can last."
![]() |
4 Disc Blu-ray set now on sale |
Although the debate still rages, it does appear from much of this 50th Anniversary talk that Oswald is the accepted culprit by the public and the media. Consider this recent LA Times Editorial from a member of the Warren Commission, justifying the lone-assassin theory.
Oliver Stone wants you to make up your own mind. He describes the facts that disprove Lee Harvey Oswald as the lone assassin, and the information that shows the evidence of a massive cover-up. He encourages all citizens to do their own research, and recommends the following books:
Jim DiEugenio "Reclaiming Parkland"
Jim DiEugenio "Destiny Betrayed"
James Douglass "JFK and the Unspeakable"
John Newman "Oswald and the CIA"
Cyril Wecht "Cause of Death"
Joan Mellen "A Farewell to Justice"
Gary Aguilar "Trauma Room One"
Robert Groden "Absolute Proof"
Gearld McKnight "Breach of Trust"
So why does President Kennedy and his assassination matter? His death on November 22, 1963 was a turning point (neither the first nor the last), when the country could have fulfilled its promise as a beacon of new ideas. Instead, hope gave way to subsequent decades of war and conservatism, greed and corruption. Maybe the '60s as we know it would never have happened - both the bad and the good. Or was everything inevitable? A world without war - seems unlikely. Whether in drama or reality, conflict is inevitable. An alternate history is all just science fiction.
Oliver Stone ends "JFK" with a single title card that reads: 'What's past is prologue.'
Even if we learn history, are we doomed to repeat it?